United States v. County of Nassau

907 F.2d 397, 1990 WL 100344
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided July 16, 1990·No. No. 1741, Docket 90-6146·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Nassau County appeals from Judge Mishler’s judgment of denial of the County’s motion for modification of the August 2, 1989 Consent Decree and Enforcement Agreement requiring the County to construct dewatering facilities at one of its sewage treatment plants. Judge Mishler’s opinion, familiarity with which is assumed, is reported at 733 F.Supp. 563 (E.D.N.Y.1990). We believe that whether the standards governing modification of a consent decree are liberal or stringent, the grounds argued by the County as a basis for modification are wholly speculative and insubstantial. The effect of the modification requested, moreover, would undermine the purpose of the decree. We therefore affirm for substantially the reasons stated by Judge Mishler.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. County of Nassau, 907 F.2d 397, 1990 WL 100344 (2d Cir. 1990).

907 F.2d 397 (United States v. County of Nassau) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related