Home/U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York/United States v. Cottingham

United States v. Cottingham

25 F. Cas. 673, 2 Blatchf. 470, 1852 U.S. App. LEXIS 366
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York
DecidedOctober 20, 1852
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 25 F. Cas. 673 (United States v. Cottingham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Cottingham, 25 F. Cas. 673, 2 Blatchf. 470, 1852 U.S. App. LEXIS 366 (circtndny 1852).

Opinion

THE COURT

decided that the prisoner had no right to any of the peremptory challenges claimed, because such challenges were not allowed at common law in any other than capital cases. See note to U. S. v. Reed [Case No. 16,134.]

It also charged the jury that the purpose for- which the letter from which the money was taken was mailed, was not a question un-' der the act.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Grimm
50 F. 528 (E.D. Missouri, 1892)
Walster v. United States
42 F. 891 (N.D. New York, 1890)
United States v. Wight
38 F. 106 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan, 1889)
United States v. Rapp
30 F. 818 (U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Georgia, 1887)
Ex parte Peters
12 F. 461 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri, 1880)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 F. Cas. 673, 2 Blatchf. 470, 1852 U.S. App. LEXIS 366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cottingham-circtndny-1852.