United States v. Cottingham
25 F. Cas. 673, 2 Blatchf. 470, 1852 U.S. App. LEXIS 366
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York·Decided October 20, 1852·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
decided that the prisoner had no right to any of the peremptory challenges claimed, because such challenges were not allowed at common law in any other than capital cases. See note to U. S. v. Reed [Case No. 16,134.]
It also charged the jury that the purpose for- which the letter from which the money was taken was mailed, was not a question un-' der the act.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Cottingham, 25 F. Cas. 673, 2 Blatchf. 470, 1852 U.S. App. LEXIS 366 (circtndny 1852).
25 F. Cas. 673 (United States v. Cottingham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Grimm
50 F. 528 (E.D. Missouri, 1892)
Walster v. United States
42 F. 891 (N.D. New York, 1890)
United States v. Wight
38 F. 106 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan, 1889)
United States v. Rapp
30 F. 818 (U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Georgia, 1887)
Ex parte Peters
12 F. 461 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri, 1880)