United States v. Costa
This text of 19 M.J. 980 (United States v. Costa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Army Court of Military Review primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
OPINION OF THE COURT
Appellant contends that he was prejudiced by the sentence limitation terms of the pretrial agreement which were operative only if a punitive discharge was adjudged. In light of United States v. Castleberry, 18 M.J. 826 (ACMR 1984), and United States v. Holmes, 17 M.J. 830 (ACMR), pet. denied, 18 M.J. 438 (CMA 1984), we find this contention to be without merit. Such provisions are not violative of public policy. We have also considered the remaining assignments of error and find them to be without merit.
The findings of guilty and the sentence are affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
19 M.J. 980, 1985 CMR LEXIS 4139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-costa-usarmymilrev-1985.