United States v. Costa
Opinions
OPINION OF THE COURT
Appellant contends that he was prejudiced by the sentence limitation terms of the pretrial agreement which were operative only if a punitive discharge was adjudged. In light of United States v. Castleberry, 18 M.J. 826 (ACMR 1984), and United States v. Holmes, 17 M.J. 830 (ACMR), pet. denied, 18 M.J. 438 (CMA 1984), we find this contention to be without merit. Such provisions are not violative of public policy. We have also considered the remaining assignments of error and find them to be without merit.
The findings of guilty and the sentence are affirmed.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
19 M.J. 980 (United States v. Costa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.