United States v. Cossyleon-Becerra
This text of 47 F. App'x 455 (United States v. Cossyleon-Becerra) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Ruben Cossyleon-Becerra is challenging his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), with a sentencing enhancement pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Cossyleon-Becerra contends that due process requires the government to notify him that his legal permanent resident (“LPR”) status was revoked, and that the district court, therefore, erred by denying his pretrial motion to include a jury instruction requiring a finding that such notification was mailed to his last known address. To the extent that the defendant hasn’t waived his right to appeal the district court’s denial of his pretrial motion, we conclude that the district court properly rejected Cossyleon-Becerra’s proposed instruction because the record shows that he was adequately notified that his LPR status was terminated upon deportation. See United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 294 F.3d 1192, 1196 (9th Cir.2002).1
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
47 F. App'x 455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cossyleon-becerra-ca9-2002.