United States v. Corrine Brown

976 F.3d 1233
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Corrine Brown. Read the opinion of the Court — 947 F.3d 655
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided September 24, 2020·No. 17-15470·Published

Opinion

Case: 17-15470 Date Filed: 09/24/2020 Page: 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________

No. 17-15470 ________________________

D.C. Docket No. 3:16-cr-00093-TJC-JRK-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CORRINE BROWN,

Defendant - Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida ________________________

Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, WILSON, JORDAN, MARTIN, ROSENBAUM, NEWSOM, BRANCH, GRANT, LUCK, LAGOA, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges.

A petition for rehearing having been filed and a member of this Court in

active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard en

Judge Jill Pryor has recused herself and did not participate in the poll to rehear this appeal en banc. Case: 17-15470 Date Filed: 09/24/2020 Page: 2 of 2

banc, and a majority of the judges of this Court in active service who are not

disqualified having voted in favor of granting rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED

that this case will be reheard en banc. The panel’s opinion is VACATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Corrine Brown, 976 F.3d 1233 (11th Cir. 2020).

976 F.3d 1233 (United States v. Corrine Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.