United States v. Correa
This text of 139 F. App'x 825 (United States v. Correa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Alfredo Correa appeals the district court’s order revoking his supervised release. The district court lacked jurisdiction to revoke Correa’s supervised release after the supervision term had expired because no warrant, based upon sworn allegations, was issued during the supervision term as required by 18 U.S.C. § 3583(i). United States v. Vargas-Amaya, 389 F.3d 901, 907 (9th Cir.2004).
The district court’s order is therefore VACATED and the case is remanded for further proceedings.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
139 F. App'x 825, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-correa-ca9-2005.