United States v. Coronado

17 F. App'x 686
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedAugust 30, 2001
DocketNo. 97-50521; D.C. No. CR-97-00016-AHS
StatusPublished

This text of 17 F. App'x 686 (United States v. Coronado) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Coronado, 17 F. App'x 686 (9th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM2

Appellant Richard Acuna Coronado pleaded guilty to one count of bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). He filed a timely notice of appeal. While this appeal was pending, Coronado died. Coronado’s attorney has now filed a motion to abate the appeal on Coronado’s behalf.

“Death pending an appeal of a criminal conviction abates not only the appeal but all proceedings in the prosecution from its inception.” United States v. Oberlin, 718 F.2d 894, 895 (9th Cir.1983).

Accordingly, we conclude that the appeal should be dismissed and the case remand[687]*687ed to the district court to vacate the judgment and dismiss the indictment. See id. at 895-96.

APPEAL DISMISSED; CASE REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS TO VACATE JUDGMENT AND DISMISS INDICTMENT.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Marcel Raymond Oberlin
718 F.2d 894 (Ninth Circuit, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 F. App'x 686, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-coronado-ca9-2001.