United States v. Cornelius James Ryan

862 F.2d 871, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 14990, 1988 WL 124904
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 10, 1988
Docket88-6735
StatusUnpublished

This text of 862 F.2d 871 (United States v. Cornelius James Ryan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Cornelius James Ryan, 862 F.2d 871, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 14990, 1988 WL 124904 (4th Cir. 1988).

Opinion

862 F.2d 871
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Cornelius James RYAN, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 88-6735.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Sept. 22, 1988.
Decided: Nov. 10, 1988.

Cornelius James Ryan, appellant pro se.

Karen Breeding Peters (Office of the United States Attorney), for appellee.

Before WIDENER, ERVIN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Cornelius James Ryan appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.* Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Ryan, CA-88-149-R; CR-85-59-R (W.D.Va. June 16, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

*

Ryan has sought the appointment of counsel by this Court, but we deny Ryan's motion in light of his obvious abilities and the straight forward nature of his claims. See Whisenant v. Yuam, 739 F.2d 160 (4th Cir.1984)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Vaughn (Leonard Garfield)
862 F.2d 871 (Fourth Circuit, 1988)
Whisenant v. Yuam
739 F.2d 160 (Fourth Circuit, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
862 F.2d 871, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 14990, 1988 WL 124904, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cornelius-james-ryan-ca4-1988.