United States v. Cornelius Frazier, Jr.

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Cornelius Frazier, Jr.

463 F.2d 781, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 8478

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJuly 12, 1972

Docket71-2717

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 463 F.2d 781 (United States v. Cornelius Frazier, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Cornelius Frazier, Jr., 463 F.2d 781, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 8478 (9th Cir. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction in this selective service case is affirmed.

We find no abuse of discretion in the failure to grant a continuance.

We also find the evidence on both counts sufficient. On Count I it should be pointed out that the jury did not have to believe the defendant’s testimony that he did not receive the notice to report for induction.

The abatement point offered is foreclosed by our United States v. Westfall, 447 F.2d 1375 (9 Cir. 1971).

The contention that the order to report was punitive is not supported by the record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI