United States v. Cornelius Frazier, Jr.

463 F.2d 781, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 8478
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 12, 1972·No. 71-2717·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction in this selective service case is affirmed.

We find no abuse of discretion in the failure to grant a continuance.

We also find the evidence on both counts sufficient. On Count I it should be pointed out that the jury did not have to believe the defendant’s testimony that he did not receive the notice to report for induction.

The abatement point offered is foreclosed by our United States v. Westfall, 447 F.2d 1375 (9 Cir. 1971).

The contention that the order to report was punitive is not supported by the record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Cornelius Frazier, Jr., 463 F.2d 781, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 8478 (9th Cir. 1972).

463 F.2d 781 (United States v. Cornelius Frazier, Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related