United States v. Cornelius Anderson

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
• Decided: June 4, 2020
• Docket: 19-3106
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 19-3106 ___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Cornelius Anderson

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Fayetteville ____________

Submitted: May 27, 2020 Filed: June 4, 2020 [Unpublished] ____________

Before KELLY, WOLLMAN, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

The district court 1 gave Cornelius Anderson a 60-month prison sentence for conspiring to sell stolen firearms. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 922(j). In an Anders brief,

1 The Honorable Timothy L. Brooks, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. Anderson’s counsel seeks permission to withdraw and challenges a sentence enhancement for trafficking firearms and the lack of a reduction for acceptance of responsibility. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

There is adequate support in the record for the firearms-trafficking enhancement. See United States v. Willett, 623 F.3d 546, 548–49 (8th Cir. 2010) (discussing the standard of review); see also U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(5). Anderson’s plea stipulations and other evidence established that he personally facilitated the sale of at least two stolen firearms. See Willett, 623 F.3d at 549. The district court also had reason to deny an acceptance-of-responsibility reduction, because Anderson later attempted to deny at sentencing what he had already admitted in his plea agreement. See United States v. Davis, 875 F.3d 869, 875 (8th Cir. 2017) (affirming the denial of a reduction because the defendant had “denied much of the conduct relevant to her convictions”).

Finally, we have independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and conclude that there are no other non-frivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment and grant counsel permission to withdraw. ______________________________

-2-