United States v. Corinthur Roddy

887 F.2d 1088, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 15645, 1989 WL 120632
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided October 13, 1989·No. 89-3117·Unpublished

Opinion

887 F.2d 1088

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Corinthur RODDY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 89-3117.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Oct. 13, 1989.

Before KEITH, MILBURN and ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof, the court finds that there is substantial evidence to support the verdict of the jury and that no prejudicial error has intervened.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the judgment of the district court be and it hereby is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Corinthur Roddy, 887 F.2d 1088, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 15645, 1989 WL 120632 (6th Cir. 1989).

887 F.2d 1088 (United States v. Corinthur Roddy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Woolum (William D.) v. Scroggy (Gene)
887 F.2d 1088 (Sixth Circuit, 1989)