United States v. Coria-Jimenez

8 F. App'x 717
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedApril 19, 2001
DocketNo. 99-30257; D.C. No. CR-99-00293-JCC
StatusPublished

This text of 8 F. App'x 717 (United States v. Coria-Jimenez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Coria-Jimenez, 8 F. App'x 717 (9th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM2

Maurillio Coria-Jimenez appeals the 40-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to illegal reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Citing Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), Coria-Jimenez contends that the district court committed plain error by imposing, based on prior aggravated felony convictions not alleged in the information, a sentence in excess of § 1326(a)’s two-year statutory maximum. This argument is foreclosed by United [718]*718States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411 (9th Cir.2000), amended (Feb. 8, 2001) (order).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Apprendi v. New Jersey
530 U.S. 466 (Supreme Court, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 F. App'x 717, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-coria-jimenez-ca9-2001.