United States v. Coria-Jimenez
This text of 8 F. App'x 717 (United States v. Coria-Jimenez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM2
Maurillio Coria-Jimenez appeals the 40-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to illegal reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Citing Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), Coria-Jimenez contends that the district court committed plain error by imposing, based on prior aggravated felony convictions not alleged in the information, a sentence in excess of § 1326(a)’s two-year statutory maximum. This argument is foreclosed by United [718]*718States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411 (9th Cir.2000), amended (Feb. 8, 2001) (order).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 F. App'x 717, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-coria-jimenez-ca9-2001.