United States v. Corey Benjamin

498 F. App'x 664
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided February 15, 2013·No. 12-2164·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Corey Benjamin appeals after he pled guilty to a firearm offense, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1), 924(a)(2), and 924(e), and the district court 1 sentenced him to fifteen years in prison, the statutory minimum. His counsel has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), requesting leave to withdraw.

Benjamin’s own admissions at his change-of-plea hearing established that he had violated 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), and that he had at least three previous convictions for separate offenses within the terms of 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). Thus, after carefully and independently reviewing the record in accordance with Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we conclude that there are no non-frivolous issues for review. See 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) (person who violates § 922(g)(1) and has three previous convictions for violent felony or serious drug offense, or both, committed on different occasions from one another, shall be imprisoned not less than 15 years); United States v. Watts, 553 F.3d 603, 604 (8th Cir.2009) (per curiam) (“District courts lack the authority to reduce sentences below congres-sionally-mandated statutory mínimums.”) (citation omitted).

*665 Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm.

1

. The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Corey Benjamin, 498 F. App'x 664 (8th Cir. 2013).

498 F. App'x 664 (United States v. Corey Benjamin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)
United States v. Watts
553 F.3d 603 (Eighth Circuit, 2009)