United States v. Cordova Chemical Co. Of Michigan, Cpc International, Inc., Arnold C. Ott, Michigan Dept. Of Natural Resources

67 F.3d 586, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 29702
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedOctober 19, 1995
Docket2326
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 67 F.3d 586 (United States v. Cordova Chemical Co. Of Michigan, Cpc International, Inc., Arnold C. Ott, Michigan Dept. Of Natural Resources) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Cordova Chemical Co. Of Michigan, Cpc International, Inc., Arnold C. Ott, Michigan Dept. Of Natural Resources, 67 F.3d 586, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 29702 (6th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

67 F.3d 586

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
CORDOVA CHEMICAL CO. OF MICHIGAN, et al., Defendants-Appellants,
CPC International, Inc., Defendant-Appellee,
Arnold C. Ott, et al., Defendants,
Michigan Dept. of Natural Resources, Defendant-Appellee.

Nos. 92-2288/2326.

United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.

Oct. 19, 1995.

Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge; KENNEDY, MARTIN, MILBURN, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, DAUGHTREY, and MOORE, Circuit Judges.

Prior report: 59 F.3d 584

ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as possible.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martignetti v. Haigh-Farr, Inc.
425 Mass. 294 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 F.3d 586, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 29702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cordova-chemical-co-of-michigan-cpc-international-inc-ca6-1995.