United States v. Cordova Chemical Co.

67 F.3d 586

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Cordova Chemical Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 113 F.3d 572 →

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided October 19, 1995·No. Nos. 92-2288/2326·Published

Opinion

ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en bane shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this ease is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as possible.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en bane shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this ease is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as possible.

United States v. Cordova Chemical Co., 67 F.3d 586 (6th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

67 F.3d 586 (United States v. Cordova Chemical Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.