United States v. Cordoba

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Cordoba

671 F. App'x 745

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided November 30, 2016·No. No. 15-15469 Non-Argument Calendar·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Burns, appointed counsel on appeal for Nicolas Santiago Bacca Cordoba in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Cordoba’s conviction and sentence is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Burns, appointed counsel on appeal for Nicolas Santiago Bacca Cordoba in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Cordoba’s conviction and sentence is AFFIRMED.

United States v. Cordoba, 671 F. App'x 745 (11th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

671 F. App'x 745 (United States v. Cordoba) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related