United States v. Corder
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 20, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-10725 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus
RICHARD WILLIAM CORDER,
Defendant-Appellant. -------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:05-CR-71-4 --------------------
Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed for Richard William Corder has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Corder has not filed a
response. Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the
record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Corder (United States v. Corder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.