United States v. Cordell Sawyer
This text of 87 F. App'x 15 (United States v. Cordell Sawyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cordell Sawyer appeals the district court’s * denial of Sawyer’s 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(1) motion to terminate supervision. After carefully reviewing the record, we conclude the district court considered the relevant sentencing factors, see id., and thus did not abuse its discretion, see United States v. Jeanes, 150 F.3d 483, 484 (5th Cir.1998) (recognizing § 3583(e)(1) confers broad discretion on district court). Accordingly, we affirm, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
The Honorable Donald J. Stohr, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
87 F. App'x 15, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cordell-sawyer-ca8-2004.