United States v. Cordell Nichols Also Known as Quinndell Johnson

410 F.3d 1186, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 10557
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedJune 7, 2005
Docket03-3284
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 410 F.3d 1186 (United States v. Cordell Nichols Also Known as Quinndell Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Cordell Nichols Also Known as Quinndell Johnson, 410 F.3d 1186, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 10557 (10th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.

Defendant/Appellant Cordell Nichols was found guilty following a jury trial of one count of possession with intent to distribute approximately 4.6 kilograms of heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a), and one count of conspiracy to distribute in excess of one kilogram of heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. He was sentenced to 360 months’ imprisonment, followed by ten years of supervised release. We affirmed his conviction. 1 United States v. Nichols, 374 F.3d 959 (10th Cir.2004), vacated by — U.S. —, 125 S.Ct. 1082, 160 L.Ed.2d 1054 (2005). The Supreme Court summarily reversed and remanded our decision for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, — U.S. —, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). Nichols v. United States, — U.S. —, 125 S.Ct. 1082, 160 L.Ed.2d 1054 (2005). We requested that the parties file supplemental briefs on the applicability of Booker and subsequent Tenth Circuit cases.

The government and the defendant have both agreed that this case should be remanded to the district court for resentencing, and the government filed “Appellee’s Confession of Booker Error and Motion to Remand for Resentencing.” Although we note that appellant submitted an over-length brief without seeking permission, we accept it as filed. We GRANT the government’s motion to remand.

*1187 Accordingly, our previous opinion affirming Nichols’ conviction is REINSTATED, and the case is REMANDED to the district court for resentencing.

1

. Nichols did not challenge his sentence in his appeal to this court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Carter
Court of Appeals of Kansas, 2025
United States v. Davis
995 F.3d 1161 (Tenth Circuit, 2021)
Bryan Robinson v. The State of Wyoming
2019 WY 125 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 2019)
STATE v. ZUNGALI
2015 OK CR 8 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 2015)
United States v. Gallegos
784 F.3d 1356 (Tenth Circuit, 2015)
United States v. Juarez
607 F. App'x 779 (Tenth Circuit, 2015)
United States v. Brown
555 F. App'x 838 (Tenth Circuit, 2014)
United States v. Hunter
663 F.3d 1136 (Tenth Circuit, 2011)
State v. Moore
154 P.3d 1 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 2007)
United States v. Nichols
219 F. App'x 770 (Tenth Circuit, 2007)
United States v. William Andrews, Jr.
454 F.3d 919 (Eighth Circuit, 2006)
State v. Moore
124 P.3d 1054 (Court of Appeals of Kansas, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
410 F.3d 1186, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 10557, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cordell-nichols-also-known-as-quinndell-johnson-ca10-2005.