United States v. Coppin

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMarch 23, 2022
Docket21-10650
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Coppin (United States v. Coppin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Coppin, (5th Cir. 2022).

Opinion

Case: 21-10650 Document: 00516251131 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/23/2022

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED March 23, 2022 No. 21-10650 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk

United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Moses Coppin,

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:21-CV-916 USDC No. 3:10-CR-345-1

Before Southwick, Graves, and Costa, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* Moses Coppin, federal prisoner # 38660-177, was convicted of aiding and abetting obstruction of justice through evidence concealment and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. He moves for a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the transfer of his Federal Rule of Criminal

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. Case: 21-10650 Document: 00516251131 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/23/2022

No. 21-10650

Procedure 36 motion to this court as an unauthorized successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Because Coppin challenges his conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(1) on grounds that he raised in his first § 2255 motion, the district court correctly construed and transferred the motion. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(1); In re Bourgeois, 902 F.3d 446, 447 (5th Cir. 2018). The motion for a COA is DENIED as unnecessary, and the transfer order is AFFIRMED. See United States v. Fulton, 780 F.3d 683, 688-89 (5th Cir. 2015). Coppin’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Kendrick Fulton
780 F.3d 683 (Fifth Circuit, 2015)
In Re: Alfred Bourgeois
902 F.3d 446 (Fifth Circuit, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Coppin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-coppin-ca5-2022.