United States v. Copley
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6016
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Petitioner - Appellee,
versus
CRAIG O. COPLEY,
Respondent - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-90-47-HC)
Submitted: May 16, 2006 Decided: May 18, 2006
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Walter H. Paramore, III, Jacksonville, North Carolina, for Appellant. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Michelle T. Fuseyamore, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Craig O. Copley, who was civilly committed in 1990,
appeals from the district court’s order revoking his conditional
discharge. Because Copley was unconditionally released on
October 6, 2005, we dismiss the appeal as moot. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Copley (United States v. Copley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.