United States v. Copeland
This text of 232 F. App'x 72 (United States v. Copeland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SUMMARY ORDER
Defendant-Appellant Richard Copeland appeals from a judgment of the district court denying his motion to dismiss his indictment for illegal reentry. United States v. Copeland, 369 F.Supp.2d 275 (E.D.N.Y.2005).
In reviewing the record before us, in light of the factors and balancing test outlined in Matter of Marin, 16 I. & N. Dec. 581 (BIA 1978), we agree with the district court in its conclusion that there is not a reasonable probability that had Copeland been informed of, and sought, a Section 212(c) hearing, he would have been granted relief from deportation.
The judgment of the district court is therefore AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
232 F. App'x 72, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-copeland-ca2-2007.