United States v. Cooper

4 U.S. 341, 25 F. Cas. 626, 1 L. Ed. 859, 4 Dall. 341, 1800 U.S. LEXIS 326
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 1, 1800
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 4 U.S. 341 (United States v. Cooper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Cooper, 4 U.S. 341, 25 F. Cas. 626, 1 L. Ed. 859, 4 Dall. 341, 1800 U.S. LEXIS 326 (1800).

Opinion

4 U.S. 341 (____)
4 Dall. 341

The United States
versus
Cooper.

Supreme Court of United States.

CHASE, Justice.

The constitution gives to every man, charged with an offence, the benefit of compulsory process, to secure the attendance of his witnesses. I do not know of any privilege to exempt members of congress from the service, or the obligations, of a subpœna, in such cases. I will not sign any letter of the kind proposed. If, upon service of a subpœna, the members of congress do not attend, a different question may arise; and it will then be time enough to decide, whether an attachment ought, or ought not, to issue. It is not a necessary consequence of nonattendance, after the service of a subpœna, that an attachment shall issue. A satisfactory reason may appear to the Court, to justify, or excuse, it.

PETERS, Justice.

I know the practice in Pennsylvania to be as it has been stated; for, I have received such letters, from the Supreme Court, while I was speaker of the house of representatives, requesting that members might be permitted to attend as witnesses. In the present case, I should have no objection to acquiesce in the defendant's application, with the concurrence of the presiding Judge.

Motion refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Franklin v. Massachusetts
505 U.S. 788 (Supreme Court, 1992)
United States v. Billy Gray
565 F.2d 881 (Fifth Circuit, 1978)
Howard v. Webb
570 P.2d 42 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1977)
United States v. Ehrlichman
389 F. Supp. 95 (District of Columbia, 1974)
Gravel v. United States
408 U.S. 606 (Supreme Court, 1972)
United States v. Seeger
180 F. Supp. 467 (S.D. New York, 1960)
Appeal of Hartranft
85 Pa. 433 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1877)
Respublica v. Duane
4 Yeates 347 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1807)
Lewis v. Elmendorf
2 Johns. Cas. 222 (New York Supreme Court, 1801)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 U.S. 341, 25 F. Cas. 626, 1 L. Ed. 859, 4 Dall. 341, 1800 U.S. LEXIS 326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cooper-scotus-1800.