United States v. Cooper

79 F. App'x 64
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Cooper. Read the opinion of the Court — 274 F.3d 230
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 22, 2003·No. 03-40351·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM. *

Nancy Kelley Thetford Cooper appeals her sentence following her guilty plea conviction of bank fraud. Cooper argues that the district court abused its discretion in departing upward from the Sentencing Guidelines range and that the district court erred in refusing to group the present offense with an offense for which Cooper had previously been sentenced. The district court did not abuse its discretion, as the district court relied upon permissible factors not already taken into consideration by the Sentencing Guidelines in deciding to depart. See United States v. Raviteh, 128 F.3d 865, 871 (5th Cir.1997); U.S.S.G. § 4A1.3 (1998). The district court did not err in refusing to group the present offense with an offense for which Cooper had previously been sentenced. See United States v. Tolbert, 306 F.3d 244, 247-48 (5th Cir.2002).

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Cooper, 79 F. App'x 64 (5th Cir. 2003).

79 F. App'x 64 (United States v. Cooper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Tolbert
306 F.3d 244 (Fifth Circuit, 2002)
United States v. Danielle Pauline Ravitch
128 F.3d 865 (Fifth Circuit, 1997)