United States v. Cooper

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Cooper

473 F. App'x 269

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 25, 2012·No. No. 12-6155·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Philip Martin Cooper appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to proceed in forma pauperis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Cooper, No. 2:99-cr-00138-AWA-1 (E.D.Va. Dec. 6, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Philip Martin Cooper appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to proceed in forma pauperis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Cooper, No. 2:99-cr-00138-AWA-1 (E.D.Va. Dec. 6, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Cooper, 473 F. App'x 269 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

473 F. App'x 269 (United States v. Cooper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related