United States v. Cooley
74 M.J. 269
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces
DecidedFebruary 23, 2015
DocketNo. 15-0387/CG
StatusPublished
This text of 74 M.J. 269 (United States v. Cooley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Cooley, 74 M.J. 269 (Ark. 2015).
Opinion
CCA 1389. Notice is hereby given that a certificate for review of the decision of the United States Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals was filed under Rule 22 on this date on the following issues:
WHETHER THE COAST GUARD COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED BY FINDING THAT PRE-TRIAL CONFINEMENT CAN SERVE AS PER SE PREJUDICE FOR PURPOSES OF DETERMINING A VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 10, UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE.
WHETHER THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF APPELLEE’S CASE, CONSIDERING THE FACTORS SET OUT IN BARKER V. WINGO, 407 U.S. 514, 530 (1972) AND APPLIED TO REVIEW OF ARTICLE 10 BY UNITED STATES V. BIRGE, 52 M.J. 209, 212 (C.A.A.F. 1999), [270]*270AMOUNT TO A VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 10, UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Barker v. Wingo
407 U.S. 514 (Supreme Court, 1972)
United States v. Birge
52 M.J. 209 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 1999)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
74 M.J. 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cooley-armfor-2015.