United States v. Cook

D.C. Circuit

United States v. Cook

161 F. App'x 7

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedMay 10, 2005

DocketNo. 02-3121, 04-3053

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 161 F. App'x 7 (United States v. Cook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Cook, 161 F. App'x 7 (D.C. Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM

Consolidated with 03-3053

These causes came to be heard on the record on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and were argued by counsel. On consideration thereof, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the judgment of the District Court be affirmed as to No. 02-3121, in accordance with the opinion of the court filed March 16, 2004. It is

FURTHER ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the judgment of the District Court be affirmed in part as to No. 03-3053, and the case remanded for resentencing, in accordance with the opinion of the court filed March 16, 2004, and the court’s order granting the unopposed motion for remand for resentencing in light of the court’s opinion and United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).

The Clerk is directed to issue the mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM

Consolidated with 03-3053

These causes came to be heard on the record on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and were argued by counsel. On consideration thereof, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the judgment of the District Court be affirmed as to No. 02-3121, in accordance with the opinion of the court filed March 16, 2004. It is

FURTHER ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the judgment of the District Court be affirmed in part as to No. 03-3053, and the case remanded for resentencing, in accordance with the opinion of the court filed March 16, 2004, and the court’s order granting the unopposed motion for remand for resentencing in light of the court’s opinion and United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).

The Clerk is directed to issue the mandate forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

161 F. App'x 7, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cook-cadc-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack