United States v. Cook

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Cook

143 F. App'x 860

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 16, 2005

DocketNo. 03-50139

StatusPublished

This text of 143 F. App'x 860 (United States v. Cook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Cook, 143 F. App'x 860 (9th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Supreme Court vacated the judgment in this appeal and remanded for reconsideration in light of United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). Cook v. United States, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 997, 160 L.Ed.2d 1010 (2005). In accordance with the procedures outlined in United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc), we remand Cook’s sentence for the purpose of determining whether the sen-fence imposed would be materially different under Booker.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Supreme Court vacated the judgment in this appeal and remanded for reconsideration in light of United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). Cook v. United States, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 997, 160 L.Ed.2d 1010 (2005). In accordance with the procedures outlined in United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc), we remand Cook’s sentence for the purpose of determining whether the sen-fence imposed would be materially different under Booker.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

143 F. App'x 860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cook-ca9-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack