United States v. Cook
This text of 91 F. App'x 580 (United States v. Cook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
We affirm the district court’s sentencing determination. The images possessed by-Cook depicting a prepubescent girl engaged in vaginal intercourse with an adult male clearly portray “sadistic” conduct under United States Sentencing Guideline (U.S.S.G.) § 2G2.2. See United States v. Rearden, 349 F.3d 608, 615 (9th Cir.2003). Regardless of whether U.S.S.G. § 2G2.2(b)(3) contains a scienter requirement, in Trial Exhibits 4 and 11 the government introduced evidence sufficient to demonstrate that Cook in fact intended to possess sadistic material. See id. at 616. Because of the limited nature of the prior remand from this court the district court did not err in concluding that it had no authority to depart downward. See United States v. Matthews, 278 F.3d 880, 889 (9th Cir.2002).
We also DENY Cook’s motion for bail pending appeal for the reasons set forth in this disposition.
AFFIRMED
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 F. App'x 580, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cook-ca9-2004.