United States v. Constantine W. Parzyck
This text of 219 F.2d 706 (United States v. Constantine W. Parzyck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
219 F.2d 706
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,
v.
Constantine W. PARZYCK et al.
No. 15237.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
January 6, 1955.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota.
George E. MacKinnon, U. S. Atty., and Alex Dim, Asst. U. S. Atty., St. Paul, Minn., for appellant.
T. H. Wangensteen, Raymond J. Julkowski, Minneapolis, Minn., and William P. Murphy, St. Paul, Minn., for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
Appeal from District Court, 123 F. Supp. 385, dismissed on stipulation of parties.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
219 F.2d 706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-constantine-w-parzyck-ca8-1955.