United States v. Constantine

Second Circuit

United States v. Constantine

588 F. App'x 70

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedJanuary 7, 2015

DocketNo. 14-4354

StatusPublished

This text of 588 F. App'x 70 (United States v. Constantine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Constantine, 588 F. App'x 70 (2d Cir. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the order of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Phillip A. Kenner appeals from an order of the district court denying his motion to be released on bond pending trial on an indictment for mail fraud, wire fraud, and money laundering. 18 U.S.C.- §§ 1343, 1349, 1956. We have considered Kenner’s arguments and affirm the denial of his motion substantially for the reasons stated by the district court.

Accordingly, we AFFIRM the order of the district court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the order of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Phillip A. Kenner appeals from an order of the district court denying his motion to be released on bond pending trial on an indictment for mail fraud, wire fraud, and money laundering. 18 U.S.C.- §§ 1343, 1349, 1956. We have considered Kenner’s arguments and affirm the denial of his motion substantially for the reasons stated by the district court.

Accordingly, we AFFIRM the order of the district court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

588 F. App'x 70, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-constantine-ca2-2015.