United States v. Constant
117 F. App'x 225
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided December 30, 2004·No. No. 04-1025·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
[226]*226OPINION OF THE COURT
Arguing that the felon-in-possession statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), is unconstitutional on its face and as applied to him, Appellant Ivan Constant challenges his conviction under that statute. As we have previously considered and rejected an identical claim, see United States v. Singletary, 268 F.3d 196 (3d Cir.2001), we affirm his conviction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Constant, 117 F. App'x 225 (3d Cir. 2004).
117 F. App'x 225 (United States v. Constant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Constant
200 F. App'x 85 (Third Circuit, 2006)
Constant v. United States
544 U.S. 971 (Supreme Court, 2005)
Pritchett v. United States
544 U.S. 970 (Supreme Court, 2005)