United States v. Constant

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedDecember 30, 2004
Docket04-1025
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Constant (United States v. Constant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Constant, (3d Cir. 2004).

Opinion

Opinions of the United 2004 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

12-30-2004

USA v. Constant Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 04-1025

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2004

Recommended Citation "USA v. Constant" (2004). 2004 Decisions. Paper 27. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2004/27

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2004 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 04-1025 ___________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

IVAN CONSTANT,

Appellant ___________

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civil No. 02-cr-00434-1) District Judge: The Honorable Anita B. Brody

Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) December 13, 2004

Before: NYGAARD, ROSENN, and BECKER, Circuit Judges.

(Filed: December 30, 2004)

OPINION OF THE COURT ___________ NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.

Arguing that the felon-in-possession statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), is

unconstitutional on its face and as applied to him, Appellant Ivan Constant challenges his

conviction under that statute. As we have previously considered and rejected an identical

claim, see United States v. Singletary, 268 F.3d 196 (3d Cir. 2001), we affirm his

conviction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Constant, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-constant-ca3-2004.