United States v. Conrado Sesma-Hernandez
234 F.3d 493, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9441, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 30774, 2000 WL 1770951
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Conrado Sesma-Hernandez. Read the opinion of the Court — 253 F.3d 403 →
Opinion
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, 1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.
1
. Judge Rawlinson was recused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Conrado Sesma-Hernandez, 234 F.3d 493, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9441, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 30774, 2000 WL 1770951 (9th Cir. 2000).
234 F.3d 493 (United States v. Conrado Sesma-Hernandez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.