United States v. Conrad Old Horn, Jr.

456 F. App'x 664
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedOctober 28, 2011
Docket11-30024
StatusUnpublished

This text of 456 F. App'x 664 (United States v. Conrad Old Horn, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Conrad Old Horn, Jr., 456 F. App'x 664 (9th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Conrad Joseph Old Horn, Jr., appeals from the 51-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for assault resulting in serious bodily injury, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1153, 113(a)(6). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Old Horn contends that the district court erred by refusing to grant him a two-level reduction for acceptance of responsibility. In light of the record before the district court, there was no clear error. See United States v. Hopper, 27 F.3d 378, 381-82 (9th Cir.1994).

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Bobby Lee Hopper
27 F.3d 378 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
456 F. App'x 664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-conrad-old-horn-jr-ca9-2011.