United States v. Connor
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Appellant Michael Connor pled guilty to one count of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). The District Court sentenced Connor to 75 months imprisonment. Con-nor’s sole argument on appeal is that the felon-in-possession statute is unconstitutional because the statute exceeds Congress’s authority under the Commerce Clause.
As Connor acknowledges, this Court has upheld the constitutionality of § 922(g) against the same arguments Connor advances. See United States v. Singletary, 268 F.3d 196 (3d Cir.2001). Connor’s appeal therefore lacks merit.
We AFFIRM the judgment of the District Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
33 F. App'x 37 (United States v. Connor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.