United States v. Connor

33 F. App'x 37
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedApril 24, 2002
DocketNo. 01-3017
StatusPublished

This text of 33 F. App'x 37 (United States v. Connor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Connor, 33 F. App'x 37 (3d Cir. 2002).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

FUENTES, Circuit Judge.

Appellant Michael Connor pled guilty to one count of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). The District Court sentenced Connor to 75 months imprisonment. Con-nor’s sole argument on appeal is that the felon-in-possession statute is unconstitutional because the statute exceeds Congress’s authority under the Commerce Clause.

As Connor acknowledges, this Court has upheld the constitutionality of § 922(g) against the same arguments Connor advances. See United States v. Singletary, 268 F.3d 196 (3d Cir.2001). Connor’s appeal therefore lacks merit.

We AFFIRM the judgment of the District Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 F. App'x 37, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-connor-ca3-2002.