United States v. Conner

District of Columbia

United States v. Conner

1 D.C. 102

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia

DecidedDecember 15, 1802

StatusPublished

This text of 1 D.C. 102 (United States v. Conner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Conner, 1 D.C. 102 (D.D.C. 1802).

Pincite

Opinion

The Couet

instructed the jury that it was not necessary for the United States to prove that the traverser was the owner of the table, if he played at it as owner, and appeared to be the person who set it up. And that it was of no importance whether the traverser áeted as principal or as agent or servant for the owner of the table. In each case he was equally guilty.

(Quosre. See the last case and the cases there referred to.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Couet

instructed the jury that it was not necessary for the United States to prove that the traverser was the owner of the table, if he played at it as owner, and appeared to be the person who set it up. And that it was of no importance whether the traverser áeted as principal or as agent or servant for the owner of the table. In each case he was equally guilty.

(Quosre. See the last case and the cases there referred to.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 D.C. 102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-conner-dcd-1802.