United States v. Conner

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

United States v. Conner

25 F. Cas. 595, 1 Cranch 102

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

DecidedDecember 15, 1802

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 25 F. Cas. 595 (United States v. Conner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Conner, 25 F. Cas. 595, 1 Cranch 102 (circtddc 1802).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COU.RT

instructed the jury that it was not necessary for the United States to prove that the traverser was the owner of the table, if he played at it as owner, and' appeared to be the person who set it up. And that it was of no importance whether the traverser acted as principal or as agent or servant for the owner of the table. In each case he was equally guilty.

Quaere. See U. S. v. Voss [Case No. 16,828], and the cases there referred to.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COU.RT

instructed the jury that it was not necessary for the United States to prove that the traverser was the owner of the table, if he played at it as owner, and' appeared to be the person who set it up. And that it was of no importance whether the traverser acted as principal or as agent or servant for the owner of the table. In each case he was equally guilty.

Quaere. See U. S. v. Voss [Case No. 16,828], and the cases there referred to.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 F. Cas. 595, 1 Cranch 102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-conner-circtddc-1802.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack