United States v. Connelly
This text of United States v. Connelly (United States v. Connelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT July 16, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-30937 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
PATRICK CONNELLY,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 02-CR-307-8-C
Before JOLLY, JONES and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Patrick Connelly appeals his sentence following his
guilty plea convictions of conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine
and unlawful use of a communication facility. Connelly argues that
the district court erred in finding by a preponderance of the
evidence that he was responsible for over 20 grams of
methamphetamine, as the testimony upon which this finding was based
was not sufficiently reliable. The testimony upon which the
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. district court relied for sentencing did possess “sufficient
indicia of reliability to support its probable accuracy.” See
United States v. Medina, 161 F.3d 867, 876 (5th Cir. 1998).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Connelly, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-connelly-ca5-2004.