United States v. Conklin

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7468

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ERIC KAVE CONKLIN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, Chief District Judge. (1:03-cr-00096-jpj)

Submitted: December 13, 2007 Decided: December 21, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eric Kave Conklin, Appellant Pro Se. Dennis H. Lee, COMMONWEALTH’S ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Tazewell, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Eric Kave Conklin appeals the district court’s order

denying his “Motion in Request of a Nunc Pro Tunc Order.” We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Conklin, No. 1:03-cr-00096-jpj (W.D. Va. Sept. 20, 2007).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -