United States v. Conerly
This text of United States v. Conerly (United States v. Conerly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT August 18, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-20036 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
AL SEVESTER CONERLY,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CR-522-1 --------------------
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Al Sevester Conerly has moved
for leave to withdraw from this appeal and has filed a brief as
required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Conerly
has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief but has not
filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the
record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 03-20036 -2-
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Conerly, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-conerly-ca5-2003.