United States v. Comprehensive Drug Testing, Inc.

545 F.3d 1106, 2008 WL 4471233
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Comprehensive Drug Testing, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 621 F.3d 1162
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 30, 2008·No. 05-10067, 05-15006, 05-55354·Published

Opinion

545 F.3d 1106 (2008)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
COMPREHENSIVE DRUG TESTING, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
Major League Baseball Players Association, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
United States of America, Respondent-Appellant.
In re Search Warrants Executed On April 8, 2004 at Cdt, Inc.,
Seal 1, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Seal 2, Defendant-Appellee.

Nos. 05-10067, 05-15006, 05-55354.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed September 30, 2008.

Erika R. Frick, USSF-Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

David P. Bancroft, Jeffrey C. Hallam, Esq., David J. Silbert, Esq., Keker & Van Nest, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Comprehensive Drug Testing, Inc., 545 F.3d 1106, 2008 WL 4471233 (9th Cir. 2008).

545 F.3d 1106 (United States v. Comprehensive Drug Testing, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.