United States v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
This text of 204 F.2d 689 (United States v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal by the relator from an order dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The district court, upon consideration of the petition, answer, and the complete record of the State proceedings, found the contentions of the relator to be without merit.1 Brown v. Allen, 1953, 344 U.S. 443, 457-460, 73 S.Ct. 397. Cf. United States ex rel. Master v. Baldi, 3 Cir, 1952, 198 F.2d 113. We could add nothing to that court’s opinion. The order will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
204 F.2d 689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-commonwealth-of-pennsylvania-ca3-1953.