United States v. Comito
This text of 158 F. App'x 26 (United States v. Comito) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Robert Comito appeals; the 115-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea [27]*27conviction for conspiracy and wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 1343. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
We remand the sentence for further proceedings consistent with United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc), and because we do, we need not review the issues concerning compliance with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(i)(3)(B) or whether Comito waived his challenge to an enhancement for his role in the offense.
REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the [27]*27courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
158 F. App'x 26, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-comito-ca9-2005.