United States v. Columbian Insurance Co. of Alexandria

25 F. Cas. 585, 2 D.C. 266, 2 Cranch 266
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia·Decided November 15, 1821·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

The Court

(Thruston, J., contra,)

was of opinion that the writ of error is a supersedeas to the writ of peremptory mandamus, and refused to award an attachment, and quashed the peremptory writs of mandamus which had been issued before the expiration of the ten days.

See 7 Wheaton, 534. The Supreme Court determined that a writ of error would lie, to reverse the judgment of this Court awarding a peremptory mandamus, and directed Mr. Jones to produce affidavits as to the value of the matter in controversy. Put it not appearing that it amounted to $1000, the sum required to give appellate jurisdiction to the Supreme Court from the final judgments or decrees of this Court, the Supreme Court decided that a writ of error could not regularly issue in this case, and ordered the writ of error to be quashed.

At May term, 1822, of the Circuit Court, a mandate from the Supreme Court was produced, showing that the writ of error .was dismissed; whereupon the Circuit Court granted a peremptory mandamtis to admit the petitioners, Wheelwright and others, to their seats as directors, &c.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Columbian Insurance Co. of Alexandria, 25 F. Cas. 585, 2 D.C. 266, 2 Cranch 266 (circtddc 1821).

25 F. Cas. 585 (United States v. Columbian Insurance Co. of Alexandria) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daley v. Choate
Tenth Circuit, 2025
The Robert S. Besnard
144 F. 992 (D. South Carolina, 1906)
Law
122 F. 816 (D. Maine, 1903)
Baker Salvage Co. v. The Fannie Brown
30 F. 215 (E.D. Virginia, 1887)
The Sandringham
10 F. 556 (E.D. Virginia, 1882)