United States v. Colon Norris

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Colon Norris

325 F.2d 209, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 3581

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedNovember 26, 1963

Docket8967_1

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 325 F.2d 209 (United States v. Colon Norris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Colon Norris, 325 F.2d 209, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 3581 (4th Cir. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant-appellant urges as reversible error the refusal of the trial court to grant a motion to withdraw a juror and declare a mistrial. One of the defendant’s own alibi witnesses testified concerning a purchase of non-tax-paid whiskey by one Ralph Wilson, and denied that the purchase was made from the defendant as charged by the government or that the defendant was present at the time. The witness referred to his conversation with Ralph Wilson wherein the latter stated that he and the defendant “built some time” together at Green-ville. There was no objection to this testimony.

On cross-examination of this witness, government counsel asked: “Didn’t you just testify that Ralph told you that he and Colon [the defendant] were building time together.” Before the question was answered, defense counsel interposed an objection and the Court ruled: “The objection is sustained. Gentlemen of the jury, you will not consider the last question propounded to the witness * * *. Erase that from your minds.”

Ordinarily, the granting or refusing of a motion for mistrial is in the sound discretion of the trial judge 1 and we find no abuse of such discretion in this case. The evidence of defendant’s guilt was overwhelming. We do not think that this asserted error substantially affected the defendant’s right to a fair trial or that it warrants a reversal of his conviction.

Affirmed.

1

. White v. United States, 279 F.2d 740, 749 (4th Cir. 1960).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant-appellant urges as reversible error the refusal of the trial court to grant a motion to withdraw a juror and declare a mistrial. One of the defendant’s own alibi witnesses testified concerning a purchase of non-tax-paid whiskey by one Ralph Wilson, and denied that the purchase was made from the defendant as charged by the government or that the defendant was present at the time. The witness referred to his conversation with Ralph Wilson wherein the latter stated that he and the defendant “built some time” together at Green-ville. There was no objection to this testimony.

On cross-examination of this witness, government counsel asked: “Didn’t you just testify that Ralph told you that he and Colon [the defendant] were building time together.” Before the question was answered, defense counsel interposed an objection and the Court ruled: “The objection is sustained. Gentlemen of the jury, you will not consider the last question propounded to the witness * * *. Erase that from your minds.”

Ordinarily, the granting or refusing of a motion for mistrial is in the sound discretion of the trial judge 1 and we find no abuse of such discretion in this case. The evidence of defendant’s guilt was overwhelming. We do not think that this asserted error substantially affected the defendant’s right to a fair trial or that it warrants a reversal of his conviction.

Affirmed.

1

. White v. United States, 279 F.2d 740, 749 (4th Cir. 1960).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

325 F.2d 209, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 3581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-colon-norris-ca4-1963.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack