United States v. Colon-Munoz

292 F.3d 18
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Colon-Munoz. Read the opinion of the Court — 292 F.3d 18
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided April 1, 2003·No. 02-1583·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 02-1583

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee,

v.

RAMIRO L. COLÓN-MUÑOZ,

Defendant, Appellant.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this court issued February 5, 2003, should be amended as follows:

On page 4, line 12, replace "regards" with "regard".

On page 5, line 15, insert "president of" before "the Bank".

On page 23, line 6, delete the word "substantial".

On page 23, line 8, insert a footnote symbol "6" following the word "allegations." The footnote reads as follows: 6 The precise standard to be met to warrant a post-trial evidentiary hearing on an alleged Brady violation has not been decided. However, it is certainly more than a mere "colorable claim."

The subsequent footnotes in the panel opinion should be renumbered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Colon-Munoz, 292 F.3d 18 (1st Cir. 2003).

292 F.3d 18 (United States v. Colon-Munoz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Williams
624 F.3d 889 (Eighth Circuit, 2010)
Rivera-Torres v. Rey-Hernandez
502 F.3d 7 (First Circuit, 2007)