United States v. Collins

371 F. App'x 709
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Collins. Read the opinion of the Court — 642 F.3d 654
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided April 12, 2010·No. No. 09-3048·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Roger Collins appeals the sentence imposed by the district court1 upon revoking his supervised release, arguing that (1) the court erred in finding that he possessed methamphetamine with intent to distribute, a Grade A violation of his supervised release; and (2) the revocation sentence is unreasonable. Upon careful review, we conclude that testimony presented at the revocation hearing supports the district court’s finding that Collins intended to distribute the methamphetamine at issue, see United States v. Ralph, 480 F.3d 888, 890 (8th Cir.2007) (district court’s fact findings as to whether violation occurred are reviewed for clear error); and as to the revocation sentence, the district court considered proper sentencing factors and we conclude that the revocation sentence is not unreasonable, see United States v. Tyson, 413 F.3d 824, 825 (8th Cir.2005) (per curiam) (standard of review).

Accordingly, we affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Collins, 371 F. App'x 709 (8th Cir. 2010).

371 F. App'x 709 (United States v. Collins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Micah E. Tyson
413 F.3d 824 (Eighth Circuit, 2005)
United States v. John Robert Ralph
480 F.3d 888 (Eighth Circuit, 2007)