United States v. Collins

538 F. App'x 340
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 27, 2013·No. No. 13-7049·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Lamatavous Regtez Collins appeals the district court’s order denying his second motion for a new trial and denying his motion for the return of forfeited property. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we deny leave to proceed under the Criminal Justice Act, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Collins, No. 1:10-cr-00466-MBS-3 (D.S.C. June 24, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Collins, 538 F. App'x 340 (4th Cir. 2013).

538 F. App'x 340 (United States v. Collins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.