United States v. Collins

538 F. App'x 340
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 27, 2013
DocketNo. 13-7049
StatusPublished

This text of 538 F. App'x 340 (United States v. Collins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Collins, 538 F. App'x 340 (4th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Lamatavous Regtez Collins appeals the district court’s order denying his second motion for a new trial and denying his motion for the return of forfeited property. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we deny leave to proceed under the Criminal Justice Act, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Collins, No. 1:10-cr-00466-MBS-3 (D.S.C. June 24, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
538 F. App'x 340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-collins-ca4-2013.