United States v. Collins

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 19, 1996·No. 96-6906·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6906

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WINSTON LEONARD COLLINS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CR-89-48)

Submitted: November 7, 1996 Decided: November 19, 1996

Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Winston Leonard Collins, Appellant Pro Se. David T. Maguire, As- sistant United States Attorney, Roscoe Conklin Howard, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

FED. R. CRIM. P. 41(e) motion for the return of seized property. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. United States v. Collins, No. CR-89-48 (E.D. Va. May 17, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Collins, (4th Cir. 1996).

United States v. Collins (United States v. Collins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.