United States v. Colin Nathanson
Opinion
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 25 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-50422
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 8:05-cr-00301-CJC-1 Central District of California, v. Santa Ana
COLIN NATHANSON, ORDER Defendant - Appellant.
Before: GOODWIN and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges, and ZOUHARY, District Judge.*
The memorandum disposition filed on December 15, 2010, is hereby
amended as follows:
The last sentence of the paragraph numbered 2, beginning of page 2 of the
disposition and continuing to page 3 is deleted. The following language is no
longer included in the disposition: Despite Nathanson’s argument that he did not
organize or lead another criminally culpable participant, this enhancement may be
applied without an express finding of such conduct where the defendant
* The Honorable Jack Zouhary, District Judge for the U.S. District Court for Northern Ohio, Toledo, sitting by designation. “nevertheless exercised management responsibility over the property, assets, or
activities of a criminal organization.” U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1 cmt. n.2 (2008).
With this amendment, Colin Nathanson’s Petition for Rehearing and
Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc, filed on January 28, 2011, is DENIED. No
additional petitions for rehearing will be entertained by the panel.
The full court has been advised of the Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc,
and no judge of the court has requested a vote.
Appellant Colin Nathanson’s Petition for Rehearing filed on January 28,
2011, is DENIED, and the Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc is REJECTED.
2 09-50422
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Colin Nathanson (United States v. Colin Nathanson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.